[anti-abuse-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Fri Nov 6 11:29:23 CET 2015
Denis, On 05/11/2015 19:40, ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk wrote: > HI all > > I am going to have one last go at solving this problem. I challenge > anyone/everyone to tell me why this is such a stupid idea, technically > impossible to do, won't solve any of the issues partially or fully. Then > I can shut up about it and go away. If you can't condemn the idea then > support it. Lets fix this issue once and for all, stop this endless > discussion about rogue ROUTE objects and get on with life. > > So here is my 4 step proposal that I believe could be implemented within > a month. If we implemented this you can be sure that all ROUTE objects > in the RIPE Database were created with the knowledge and approval of the > related resource holders. I believe that is the desired goal. Thanks for this. I think I would agree with Gert's comments about Step 4 and the timings, but that's implementation detail to a certain extent. It and other timings would be something to discuss with the NCC. The big, procedural, question to get this moved along is whether this is AA-WG or DB-WG. To be clear, I'm very happy to work with you on it either way. I'm going to have a quick chat with the DB-WG chairs and we can crank up the PDP as soon as possible, if that's ok with you? Brian
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]