[anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Nov 4 21:18:27 CET 2015
Do you feel that the numbers community comparing notes with the ICANN whois EWG would help? https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-3-2015-09-25-en > On 05-Nov-2015, at 1:32 AM, denis <ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > Seriously, with a review of the data model we can end up with: > -a lot less personal data in the database > -contact data more relevant to the purpose > -relevant contacts only visible to the groups of people who need it > -chain of trust in organisations who manage the data > -verification done closer to the data source > -more accurate and more trusted and better protected contact data
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] WHOIS (AS204224)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]