[anti-abuse-wg] Verifiability (was: WHOIS (AS204224))
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Verifiability (was: WHOIS (AS204224))
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Verifiability (was: WHOIS (AS204224))
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
aawg at c4inet.net
Tue Nov 3 03:42:33 CET 2015
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 08:06:56AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: >It needn't be done except as an additional verification step for >new asns and suspect ones Sigh. Having an ASN assigned involves exchange of signed contracts between sponsoring LIR and end-user. These, as well as company registration papers or passport copies(!) have to be approved by the NCC before assignment takes place. Exactly *what* purpose would a phone call or fax (why not TELEX if we're doing retro tech?) serve? rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Verifiability (was: WHOIS (AS204224))
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Verifiability (was: WHOIS (AS204224))
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]