[anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c cleanup

Hi,

On 5/5/2015 15:59 , denis walker wrote:

> The first two steps are done, but the last one seems to have been
> overlooked. The idea of "abuse-c:" was to create one single place/way of
> documenting abuse contact details. So far all that has been achieved is
> to add a fourth way to document it. All the old ways ("abuse-mailbox:"
> in 5 object types, IRT and remarks) are still littered throughout the
> database.
> 
> I think it is time to schedule that cleanup.

I'd like to have the "cleanup" defined and discussed before doing it.
The 'remarks' are obviously not really useful, and the abuse-c seems to
replace functionally the abuse-mailbox (except that I still miss a 'more
specific' abuse-c). The IRT objects are different though, and have
features that the abuse-c lacks. So unless the abuse-c is able to
replace the IRT, I'd object to deleting those.

(to be specific: I'd hate to lose the signature and encryption fields -
I think it was a mistake not to add those to the abuse-c from the start)

best,
Gilles