[anti-abuse-wg] Hijack Factory: AS201640 / AS200002
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijack Factory: AS201640 / AS200002
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijack Factory: AS201640 / AS200002
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Sat Nov 8 21:11:48 CET 2014
In message <20141108005303.GD58817 at cilantro.c4inet.net>, Sascha Luck <lists-ripe at c4inet.net> wrote: >On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 12:03:57AM +0000, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: >>But I doubt you or anyone else can ask to stop any proposal at all being >>placed on the agenda. Whether or not it gets consensus is a different next > >Just. Try. Me. This goes to the full forum or it goes nowhere. "This" what? Other than my own rather informal suggestion that contract terms and expectation could be made more plain, I don't recall having seen anything specific put forward here would might even vaguely be called an actual "proposal". So I'm mystified about what it is that you are, I gather, opposed to. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijack Factory: AS201640 / AS200002
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijack Factory: AS201640 / AS200002
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]