[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE Autonomous System Numbers

On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 11:06:34AM +0100, furio ercolessi wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 06:38:36AM +0000, Sascha Luck wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 04:37:13PM -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> > [...]
> > >So there is no trace... no chain of documentation on how an AS got to
> > >be an AS.  Is that correct?  Is that really what you are telling me?
> > 
> > It is not. There is a contract for every independent resource assigned
> > after -525 came into force and when Phase 3 is completed, there will be
> > contracts for legacy ASN/PI resources also.
> > These contracts are confidential and not public information. On this
> > side of the pond, we call it "data protection" and it is the law.
> 
> But if the community perceives that the amount of information disclosed 
> in the public database is not adequate to the needs (and I personally 
> regretted to be unable to get the informations that RFG is talking about, 
> several times!), then new information could be supplied in the whois after
> asking for consent from the resource holder, no ?
> 
> So perhaps we can take this opportunity to discuss an extension of
> the data shown in the public whois.

Have any of you ever consider making a policy proposal to change this?

Piotr

-- 
gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski
E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl