[anti-abuse-wg] Final Draft Version - Appointment & Removal of AA-WG Chairs

Brian,

Without wanting to argue on the local presence for the election, I
wanted to know whether you think if the chair-selection-process should
be considered a kind of policy (and thus be decided consensus based on
the mailing list), or rather something to be managed under the authority
of the chair? Or in-between? (...and no, I'm not proposing a PDP to
define the process for selecting a process for choosing WG chair - this
is not ICANN after all...)

best,
Gilles
(who is slightly annoyed for having to chose between MAT-wg and
anti-abuse-wg...)


On 4/11/2014, 15:04 , Brian Nisbet wrote:
> Colleagues,
> 
> Apologies for the long delay on this, here is some very slightly revised
> text. It hasn't diverged much from the text of the 26th of September,
> but I've taken into account a number of comments that were made,
> especially around language.
> 
> It is still my intention, at least initially, to limit this to the
> people in the room at a WG session at a RIPE meeting, but obviously this
> is up to the WG, so we can discuss this tomorrow.
> 
> **************