[anti-abuse-wg] Working Group Charter, Draft 2

It's been pointed out to me (thanks Leo!), that the WG is called Anti-Spam below. This is a mistake, to clarify, we're still very much the Anti-Abuse WG.

Brian

On 3 June 2014 17:12:49 GMT+01:00, Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet at heanet.ie> wrote:
>Colleagues,
>
>Having taken on board a number of points, here is another draft of
>this. 
>I think we've got the kinks knocked out, so to speak, or at least 
>reached a point where rough consensus may be manageable. I'm going to 
>set a deadline of 15:00 UTC +1 on Friday 6th June to end this round of 
>discussions. Obviously if something needs to be discussed beyond that, 
>it can, but we've been talking about this for a couple of weeks now.
>
>Importantly while I'd like some statements of support, silence, at this
>
>point, will be taken to indicate consent.
>
>Please see the draft below,
>
>Brian
>
>**********************************
>
>As the Internet has evolved, so has the scope and scale of network 
>abuse.  Unsolicited bulk email (spam) is often merely a symptom of 
>deeper abuse such as viruses or botnets.  Consequently the Anti-Spam 
>Working Group has a wide scope, to include all relevant kinds of abuse.
>
>The technical details of spam and other abuse constantly vary, in terms
>
>of application channel and technique.  Channel examples include SMTP, 
>SIP, XMPP and HTTP.  Examples of techniques range from buffer overrun
>to 
>social engineering.
>
>       Within scope are all systems and mechanisms, both technical and 
>non-technical, that are used to create, control, and make money from, 
>such abuse.
>
>        While areas such as hosting illegal content or copyright 
>infringement are not seen as a central part of the working group's 
>remit, they are unquestionably bound up in other aspects of network 
>abuse and, as such, may be areas of interest.
>
>The working group considers both technical and non-technical aspects of
>
>abuse, with the following goals:
>
>        Produce and continue to update a BCP (Best Common Practice) 
>document for ISPs similar in nature to RIPE-409 but covering a wider 
>range of possible abusive behaviours.
>
>        Provide advice (beyond that of the BCP) to relevant parties 
>within the RIPE region such as ISPs, Governments and Law Enforcement 
>Agencies on strategic and operational matters.
>
>        Discuss and disseminate information on technical and 
>non-technical methods of preventing or reducing network abuse.

-- 
Brian Nisbet
Network Operations Manager, HEAnet
(Sent from a mobile device, apologies for brevity)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20140603/18ce259b/attachment.html>