[anti-abuse-wg] So now spam on v6?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] So now spam on v6?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] So now spam on v6?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
H.Lu
h.lu at anytimechinese.com
Thu Jan 23 22:15:22 CET 2014
Hi guys: Sharing this email here for two reasons 1. It's so funny someone would pay 2000usd for a trillion address. 2. IPv6 already being spammed? How we going to stop it? Block whole /29? Wonder if there is already a good technical solution to this. Kind regards Lu > On 2014年1月23日, at 下午9:43, Elvis Velea <elvis at velea.eu> wrote: > > Hi Lu, > > I think the message is a hoax... > > it costs less to open an LIR and use a /29 for at least a year. > > cheers, > elvis > >> On 23/01/14 21:06, Lu Heng wrote: >> Hey Guys: >> >> Just receive following today, wonder how trillions of address only >> worth 2000USD:): >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> We are media company specializing in PPC and high-traffic campaigns. >> For our email operations we are looking to lease a IPv6 space. We >> guarantee that our marketing operation does not generate any >> complaints. >> >> >> >> If you have a /29 or few /32 available that you could lease then let >> me know. Since IPv6 is experimental I am willing to pay up to $400 for >> a /32 lease on which I will test 4-5 days. If testing is successful, I >> will take 2x /32 space and commit to use minimum 6-month. Payment will >> be like this: >> >> >> >> 1st month = $2000 x 1 /32s >> >> 2,3,4 month = $1500 >> >> 5,6 month = $1100 >> >> >> >> Let me know. > >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] So now spam on v6?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] So now spam on v6?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]