[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] abuse-c + org / inetnum
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] abuse-c + org / inetnum
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] abuse-c + org / inetnum
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Oct 8 13:29:43 CEST 2013
Hi, On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 11:00:28PM +0200, Gilles Massen wrote: > Something else in mind: as before: allow abuse-c for inet*num. Prefer This. (But I've said this before :-) - I do not see it as a useful excercise having to create an organization: object for the sole purpose of being able to have a different abuse-c: for some inet(6)num object) Gert Doering -- inetnum maintainer -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 306 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20131008/30f74aa1/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] abuse-c + org / inetnum
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] abuse-c + org / inetnum
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]