[anti-abuse-wg] 2013-01 Discussion Period extended until 26 June 2013 (Openness about Policy Violations)
Ronald F. Guilmette rfg at tristatelogic.com
Thu Jun 27 10:58:11 CEST 2013
In message <C9593F67FE4B1342BBC009DF73251B2C1DD78B3B at S01KR973.intern.dir>, "DOI (BIT A 5)" <doi at bva.bund.de> wrote: >To prevent abuse and to give the holder a fair chance to resolve any policy= > violation before the report is published there has to be a time for a repl= >y of four weeks. If the holder has resolved all problems before expiration = >of the deadline, the report is not published. Four weeks? Yea. Sure. That seems fair. After all, we all know how much more slowly electrons travel in Europe. Not to mention the two months they get off in the summertime. And then there is paternity leave, you know, after they have just had a a baby electron. Maybe we should make it 12 weeks, you know, to give people a chance to setttle in if they have just come back from summer holiday.