[anti-abuse-wg] Who owns 24.205.98.101?

Hello Peter,

The Whois information clearly shows this IP to be part of Charter Communications network:

NetRange:       24.205.76.0 - 24.205.99.255
CIDR:           24.205.96.0/22, 24.205.80.0/20, 24.205.76.0/22
OriginAS:       
NetName:        CHAR-PAS-205-76-99
NetHandle:      NET-24-205-76-0-1
Parent:         NET-24-205-0-0-1
NetType:        Reallocated
RegDate:        2001-09-30
Updated:        2003-08-27
Ref:            http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-24-205-76-0-1

OrgName:        Charter Communications
OrgId:          CC04
Address:        12405 Powerscourt Dr.
City:           St. Louis
StateProv:      MO
PostalCode:     63131
Country:        US
RegDate:        
Updated:        2012-07-03
Ref:            http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/CC04

OrgTechHandle: IPADD1-ARIN
OrgTechName:   IPAddressing
OrgTechPhone:  +1-314-288-3889 
OrgTechEmail:  ipaddressing at chartercom.com
OrgTechRef:    http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/IPADD1-ARIN

OrgAbuseHandle: ABUSE19-ARIN
OrgAbuseName:   Abuse
OrgAbusePhone:  +1-314-288-3111 
OrgAbuseEmail:  abuse at charter.net
OrgAbuseRef:    http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/ABUSE19-ARIN

OrgNOCHandle: NNOC16-ARIN
OrgNOCName:   National Network Operations Center
OrgNOCPhone:  +1-314-288-3111 
OrgNOCEmail:  dlnocip at chartercom.com
OrgNOCRef:    http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/NNOC16-ARIN

++++

So, I do not understand why they are telling you otherwise.

I have copied the responsible parties at Charter Communication so that they could investigate this matter further.

Thank you,

Reza Farzan

******************


-----Original Message-----
>From: peter h <peter at hk.ipsec.se>
>Sent: Jun 25, 2013 9:37 AM
>To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
>Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Who owns 24.205.98.101?
>
>On Tuesday 25 June 2013 09.18, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Whois seems to say it's Charter Communications, abuse at charter.net.
>> But if I mail them, they say:
>> 
>> This email address is for reporting incidents of abuse coming from IP
>> addresses registered to Charter Communications.  Abuse from IP addresses
>> not registered to Charter Communications should be directed to the
>> registered owners of the IP address in question.
>
>If the abuse "function" don't work i suggest that blocking this range will work.
>
>If and when charter decides that their customers should have full access they
>should start with a working abuse staff ( and some more )
>Until then, we can manage without them.
>
>
><snip>
> # # #
>> 
>> From: Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek at gmail.com>
>> To: abuse at charter.net
>> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:11:38 +0200
>> Subject: DDoS Attack from 24.205.98.101
>> 
>
>-- 
>        Peter Håkanson   
>
>        There's never money to do it right, but always money to do it
>        again ... and again ... and again ... and again.
>        ( Det är billigare att göra rätt. Det är dyrt att laga fel. )
>