[anti-abuse-wg] Who owns 220.127.116.11?
Reza Farzan rezaf at mindspring.com
Tue Jun 25 16:07:37 CEST 2013
Hello Peter, The Whois information clearly shows this IP to be part of Charter Communications network: NetRange: 18.104.22.168 - 22.214.171.124 CIDR: 126.96.36.199/22, 188.8.131.52/20, 184.108.40.206/22 OriginAS: NetName: CHAR-PAS-205-76-99 NetHandle: NET-24-205-76-0-1 Parent: NET-24-205-0-0-1 NetType: Reallocated RegDate: 2001-09-30 Updated: 2003-08-27 Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-24-205-76-0-1 OrgName: Charter Communications OrgId: CC04 Address: 12405 Powerscourt Dr. City: St. Louis StateProv: MO PostalCode: 63131 Country: US RegDate: Updated: 2012-07-03 Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/CC04 OrgTechHandle: IPADD1-ARIN OrgTechName: IPAddressing OrgTechPhone: +1-314-288-3889 OrgTechEmail: ipaddressing at chartercom.com OrgTechRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/IPADD1-ARIN OrgAbuseHandle: ABUSE19-ARIN OrgAbuseName: Abuse OrgAbusePhone: +1-314-288-3111 OrgAbuseEmail: abuse at charter.net OrgAbuseRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/ABUSE19-ARIN OrgNOCHandle: NNOC16-ARIN OrgNOCName: National Network Operations Center OrgNOCPhone: +1-314-288-3111 OrgNOCEmail: dlnocip at chartercom.com OrgNOCRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/NNOC16-ARIN ++++ So, I do not understand why they are telling you otherwise. I have copied the responsible parties at Charter Communication so that they could investigate this matter further. Thank you, Reza Farzan ****************** -----Original Message----- >From: peter h <peter at hk.ipsec.se> >Sent: Jun 25, 2013 9:37 AM >To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net >Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Who owns 220.127.116.11? > >On Tuesday 25 June 2013 09.18, Olaf van der Spek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Whois seems to say it's Charter Communications, abuse at charter.net. >> But if I mail them, they say: >> >> This email address is for reporting incidents of abuse coming from IP >> addresses registered to Charter Communications. Abuse from IP addresses >> not registered to Charter Communications should be directed to the >> registered owners of the IP address in question. > >If the abuse "function" don't work i suggest that blocking this range will work. > >If and when charter decides that their customers should have full access they >should start with a working abuse staff ( and some more ) >Until then, we can manage without them. > > ><snip> > # # # >> >> From: Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek at gmail.com> >> To: abuse at charter.net >> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:11:38 +0200 >> Subject: DDoS Attack from 18.104.22.168 >> > >-- > Peter Håkanson > > There's never money to do it right, but always money to do it > again ... and again ... and again ... and again. > ( Det är billigare att göra rätt. Det är dyrt att laga fel. ) >