[anti-abuse-wg] audit proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] audit proposals
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] audit proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Tue Jun 25 13:18:44 CEST 2013
Entirely depends on the audit's conclusions. 1. Shell company in romania or the ukraine - "the documents say it is a registered company". Stop. 2. Hosting snowshoe spam or malware or whatever. "the justification just says "hosting". stop" :) On Tuesday, June 25, 2013, Frank Gadegast wrote: > Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > Sounds like a good start ... but I doubt if this should > be the job of the anti-abuse-wg or its chair. > > I would rather prever, if there would be somebody > at the RIPE NCC having this job, and setting up > another wg maillinglist (like abuse-audit at ripe.net) ... > > I personally do not like to be flodded with > discussions about specific networks, that > might or might not be audited again ... > > If this gets changed, Im +1 > > > > -- --srs (iPad) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20130625/d7e8632a/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] audit proposals
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] audit proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]