[anti-abuse-wg] Authorities, or lack thereof
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Authorities, or lack thereof
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Authorities, or lack thereof
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel.titley at easynet.com
Fri Jun 21 18:03:58 CEST 2013
Sascha >>I'm not sure about an untimely demise, per se. The NCC, nor the members >>of the NCC, have no power over the WGs, but it would >Strictly speaking, the membership can, in Plenary, disband the WG. >Also, ISTR a WG chair being "fired" in Plenary a few years ago... Sorry to be pedantic, but the "membership" (usually understood to be the members of the RIPE NCC) have no power over a WG. I think you may mean the "community", which does. And the WG chair who was fired (in Rome if I recall correctly) was actually fired by his own WG, not the plenary. As always, I stand ready to be corrected Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Authorities, or lack thereof
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Authorities, or lack thereof
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]