[anti-abuse-wg] Authorities, or lack thereof
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Authorities, or lack thereof
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Authorities, or lack thereof
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Fri Jun 21 18:18:40 CEST 2013
Hi Nigel, On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 04:03:58PM +0000, Nigel Titley wrote: >Sorry to be pedantic, but the "membership" (usually understood to be >the members of the RIPE NCC) have no power over a WG. I think you may >mean the "community", which does. You're right of course, it's the community in Plenary. >And the WG chair who was fired (in Rome if I recall correctly) was >actually fired by his own WG, not the plenary. I wasn't at the meeting, just watching the stream. I thought it was taken to the Plenary, but ICBW. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Authorities, or lack thereof
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Authorities, or lack thereof
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]