[anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Fri Jun 21 14:42:52 CEST 2013
not my intention to rake it up either but do believe me, it is dangerous if an us versus them mentality were to take root in the rir / netops community against groups that are on your side against a common enemy On Friday, June 21, 2013, Brian Nisbet wrote: > Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote the following on 21/06/2013 13:07: > >> On Friday, June 21, 2013, Erik Bais wrote: >> >> >> For those that want to read up on what actually happened on that >> specific incident in Latvia (July/August 2010), have a read on the >> following open letter from CERT.lv >> >> https://cert.lv/uploads/**uploads/OpenLetter.pdf<https://cert.lv/uploads/uploads/OpenLetter.pdf> >> >> Erik Bais >> >> To maintain some balance on an issue that involved blocking one ISP (not >> "all of latvia") that was hosting bot spammers for a very long time >> indeed .. a couple of other articles. >> >> http://www.theregister.co.uk/**2010/08/13/spamhaus_latvia/<http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/08/13/spamhaus_latvia/> >> >> And an assessment of this situation from another organization- Trend >> Micro, which can, in some cases, be seen as competing with spamhaus >> (they after all acquired the original MAPS RBL lists) >> >> http://blog.trendmicro.com/**trendlabs-security-** >> intelligence/spamhaus-listing-**rightfully-lists-latvian-**hoster/<http://blog.trendmicro.com/trendlabs-security-intelligence/spamhaus-listing-rightfully-lists-latvian-hoster/> >> >> Quite frankly my sympathies are not with nic.lv <http://nic.lv> in this >> matter. >> > > It is a complicated situation and while I'm not necessarily a fan of the > action taken or how it played out, my initial comment was overly glib. My > intent was to point out that wide reaching actions have been taken in the > past and I apologise for the remark. I have no particular with to reignite > nor insert myself into that argument. > > Brian > > -- --srs (iPad) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20130621/0de5ba87/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]