[anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Erik Bais
erik at bais.name
Fri Jun 21 13:49:36 CEST 2013
>>> Of course in amongst all of this I would suspect if the resources were >>> handed out, there would be a lot of depeering and null routing going on >>> in relation to the poor, forced-to-spam, citizens of the Grand Duchy. :) >> >> Once again, based upon the available evidence, I would claim that it >> would in fact be improbable that any substantial amount of deppeering >> and/or null routing would occur, in practice. It is a classic "trajedy >> of the commons" problem, and no operator would wish to have to explain >> to its user base why they, end end lusers, can no longer send e-mail to >> their cousins in Grand Fenwick. > I'm not sure, Spamhaus were quite happy to block Latvia for a far > smaller reason. I think if it was a mandated activity for all citizens > the reaction of the international community might be interesting. > Brian For those that want to read up on what actually happened on that specific incident in Latvia (July/August 2010), have a read on the following open letter from CERT.lv https://cert.lv/uploads/uploads/OpenLetter.pdf Erik Bais
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] New Abuse Information on RIPE NCC Website
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]