[anti-abuse-wg] Clarification Regarding Needs Assessment and Audits
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Clarification Regarding Needs Assessment and Audits
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Clarification Regarding Needs Assessment and Audits
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Thu Jul 4 22:22:08 CEST 2013
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 09:53:31PM +0200, Frank Gadegast wrote: >So, does anybody knows any reason how the NCC could >revoke an assignment or even an allocation, if >there is a technical need and all contract data >and RIPE entries are conform to the current >regulations ? TTBOMK, as long as policy requirements are fulfilled there is no mandate to revoke resources. Even if a LIR is closed for being on an embargo list, as happened recently, the resources were transferred to another, unaffected, LIR. >There SHOULD be a possibility how the NCC could >revoke assignments, if they are used for >obvious abuse. You are, of course free to initiate a policy proposal to that effect. I don't think there is much political will in the community to give the NCC a mandate to police content, however. >Sounds like to me, if an owner of a house >is renting the appartments in his house >to criminals, wich build bombs, plan bank >robberies and train terrorists >and he has no way to terminate or restrict >the contract as long as the criminals >pay the rent and empty the letterbox ... >(sorry for the harsh example, but I think >it somehow fits). I propose that the use of "terrorist" in any argument renders this argument invalid immediately. You may call it "Luck's Law" if it hasn't got a name yet... rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Clarification Regarding Needs Assessment and Audits
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Clarification Regarding Needs Assessment and Audits
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]