[anti-abuse-wg] Reclamation/AAWG charter (was: Re: Allocation of number resources)
Wilfried Woeber Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Fri Feb 22 13:33:25 CET 2013
Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: [...] > (I believe that I saw it asserted here earlier that, even as of this late > date, there is no general agreement, within this group or within the > RIPE membership as a whole as to what things might or do constitute > "abuse of the Internet". If that is correct, then offhand I would have > to say that arriving at some common understanding of that term could be, > would be, and should be the first order of business for this group, above > all else. I mean what's the point of having an "anti abuse" group if > nobody even knows for sure what "abuse" is?) I think you just made the case for dissolving the AAWG, :-) under *your* assumption that the Community on the Internet will be able to come up with a *unified definition* and *central management* of "abuse of the Internet". Wilfried.