[anti-abuse-wg] Clarification Regarding Needs Assessment and Audits
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Clarification Regarding Needs Assessment and Audits
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Clarification Regarding Needs Assessment and Audits
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Sat Aug 31 01:11:18 CEST 2013
I was starting to wonder whether anybody else with an operational antispam and security role for a large provider was around here. :) Thanks for chiming in, vijay. At a guess those v6 /32s are all registered in Romania? --srs On Saturday, August 31, 2013, Vijay Eranti (✌ విజయ్ ఈరంటి) wrote: > i agree with suresh's assessment. > > Lately lot of spammers are getting /32 ipv6 assignments with their own > ASNs and having a nice run. > The ipv4 allotment is seriously broken in ripe - just having paperwork > with valid forms filled is good enough to allot what ever range the > spammers can ask. > > regards > vijay > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian < > ops.lists at gmail.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'ops.lists at gmail.com');>>wrote: > >> The lack of progress is simply because you have very few people who are >> in a security rather than IP admin or network ops role. Security as in for >> a seriously large provider. >> >> The other lack of progress - well, changing entrenched policies, or >> enforcing them beyond a point where the enforcer is reluctant to >> investigate (or is it "play police" according to the local meme) is as >> tough as it sounds. >> >> >> On Friday, July 5, 2013, Frank Gadegast wrote: >> >>> Sascha Luck wrote: >>> >>> TTBOMK, as long as policy requirements are fulfilled >>>> there is no mandate to revoke resources. >>>> >>> >>> Any spammer on this list (think so, simply because >>> of the lack of progress) ? >>> >>> * Im starting now a second carrier in renting all >>> the IPv4 addresses left in our allocation exclusively >>> to abusers and make a lot of money with it. >>> Just make offers now. * >>> >>> Will surely put a working abuse contact email address >>> in RIPEs db, that gets directed to /dev/null >>> and have a correct postal address somewhere on >>> a funny island ... >>> >>> And it looks like if nobody could ever do anything >>> against it. >>> >>> The current regulations are simply slippery as >>> an eel (like we say in Germany), no way >>> to catch anybody responsible. Again, ridicolous ... >>> >>> >>> Kind regards, Frank >>> -- >>> PHADE Software - PowerWeb http://www.powerweb.de >>> Inh. Dipl.-Inform. Frank Gadegast mailto:frank at powerweb.de >>> Schinkelstrasse 17 fon: +49 33200 52920 >>> 14558 Nuthetal OT Rehbruecke, Germany fax: +49 33200 52921 >>> ==============================**==============================** >>> ========== >>> >>> >> >> -- >> --srs (iPad) >> > > -- --srs (iPad) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20130831/0fe8579f/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Clarification Regarding Needs Assessment and Audits
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Clarification Regarding Needs Assessment and Audits
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]