[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse contact of 85.95.235.0 - 85.95.235.255 not working (emails bounce)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse contact of 85.95.235.0 - 85.95.235.255 not working (emails bounce)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse contact of 85.95.235.0 - 85.95.235.255 not working (emails bounce)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bengt Gördén
bengan at bag.org
Wed Oct 3 12:52:42 CEST 2012
2012-10-03 12:21, U.Mutlu skrev: > Abuse email contact of 85.95.235.0 - 85.95.235.255 not working (emails > bounce): > > The abuse contact email address of the the following RIPE member > isn't functioning for more than 3 weeks now as all mails to that > address bounce: > " > SMAIL SMTP-Send MX = "mail.atalaybilisim.com." SMTP = "mutluit.com" > From = "security at mutluit.com" To = "dns at atalaybilisim.com" Failed ! > SMTP-Error = "550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable or > not local" > SMTP-Server = "mail.atalaybilisim.com." > " > > Additionally, they have given their IP 85.95.235.101 > the DNS hostname "localhost.mail.localdomain" . > The same with their second IP 85.95.235.102. > > Is this legal? Isn't that an indication for a "mail server hacker > collective"? > > The above said two IPs are among the bounced abuse reports. To be unreachable by email isn't illegal. However, according to RIPE-530 it has to be correct at all times. http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-530#----registration-requirements /bengan
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse contact of 85.95.235.0 - 85.95.235.255 not working (emails bounce)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse contact of 85.95.235.0 - 85.95.235.255 not working (emails bounce)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]