[anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
Vijay Eranti (✌ విజయ్ ఈరంటి) vijaye at google.com
Thu Mar 29 21:32:02 CEST 2012
i agree with suresh - ripe has been handing over /15 or even /13 lately to criminals who know how to use high bandwidth pipes to spam like crazy. I am not worried about a /24 given to bad guys - but in this world where ipv4 addresses are so scarce, handing over such huge range of addresses is not correct and it is common sense for everyone to understand this - how can somebody who did right paper work get /15 without proper justification ? On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:03:36PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > > Due diligence to know your customer norms accepted in most if not all the > > service provider industry is not "internet policing" and I'm certainly > not > > going to block a country at my border routers. > > If the customer is not doing anything illegal, their papers are in order > (contracts on paper arrive at the address given, and come back with > a signature), and they are paying their fees, what else do you want to > see for due diligence? > > So what? Not accept customers/members because they don't wash, and smell > bad? > > I wonder when someone will show up and demands to reject LIRs that host > content for adult entertainment... because that's illegal in some states > in the world. > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120329/dfdd5be5/attachment.html>