[anti-abuse-wg] Enabling community self-help?
Suresh Ramasubramanian ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Mar 29 16:39:09 CEST 2012
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com > wrote: > > I won't say it - but let me play devils advocate, there won't be any > shortage of law enforcement saying if the circumstances are right and if > the person handling the case feels it appropriate. At least in the UK, it is a related concept - and yes it includes money gained from theft http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handling_stolen_goods#Elements_of_the_offence > Includes any proceeds of that property, including money for which it has been sold, and anything bought with those proceeds .. and this part is a bit dodgier because - yes it will depend on interpretation, and will be sufficient grounds to at least launch a prosecution, freezing of accounts while the case is in progress etc. > The situation is further complicated by the concept of recklessness or wilful blindness to the circumstances; either will be treated as a belief that the goods are stolen. Thus, *suspicion* will be converted into belief when the facts are so obvious that belief may safely be imputed<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imputation_%28law%29> -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120329/2d3c2c39/attachment.html>