[anti-abuse-wg] meeting minutes
lists at help.org lists at help.org
Fri Jun 15 06:17:19 CEST 2012
>This is not the kind of language we will accept on this list, no matter how controversial and tough the discussion is. Save your petty little personal attacks and temper tantrums for someone else. The fact is people on this list harass and intimate people to the people no longer want to post. A number of people personally attack me but you only complain when I respond in kind. The fact is the posts speak for themselves. The people running this group have shown that their intent is to cut out most of the Internet and make the decisions themselves. Then they lie about it and claim a "consensus." Several people have contacted me off list and indicated they agree to a certain extent with what I have been saying, However, the people running this group have created an atmosphere where these people don't want to post publicly because they will be harassed and ridiculed. It all boils down to this group is a bunch of bullies who are now throwing a temper tantrums because I am standing up to the group. Just go back and look at some of the posts of how you are all arguing NOT to make it clear what the issue are that you are discussing. It all boild down to simple concept, if someone reads minutes of a meeting they should be able to tell what was done at the meeting and what issues were discussed and voted upon and possibly why the vote was made. In this case the minutes just reference some unnamed issues that aren't written down anywhere and it is not explained why they were deemed not important enough for some specific action to be taken. (this is probably the number one complaint about ICANN and ICANN_related processes). Then you all go around claiming a community "consensus." You have turned this process into a joke.