Reza Farzan rezaf at mindspring.com
Fri Jun 1 18:06:54 CEST 2012
To whom it may concern at Help.Org, If you all think that writing such a meaningless e-mail and sending it anonymously will get you anywhere, you are sadly mistaken. The "anti-abuse-wg" is an open forum where interested individuals discuss abuse related matters in connection with Whois directories. Everyone who participate in these discussions identifies himself/herself as a professional courtesy. By calling anti abuse issues "worthless", Help.Org staff who has sent this meaningless e-mail diminishes its credibility. By hiding behind "Help.Org" and "whoissecurity.com" domains, you show your unwillingness to engage in the ongoing discussions professionally here. Reza Farzan =============== -----Original Message----- >From: "lists at help.org" <lists at help.org> >Sent: Jun 1, 2012 11:18 AM >To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net >Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] WhoisSecurity.com > >While this list does not require introductions or anything of the >sort, it is always nice to at least have a name for a poster. Like I >said, it isn't required, but it might facilitate discussion if people >had some idea who they're talking >to, if that makes any sense? This is >especially useful when you're asking such a broad question. > >No, that does not make sense. The site is compiling resources and the >name of the people compiling the resources is not relevant. You just >want that information so you and people like Michele >Neylon and Dominque Custers can attempt to ridicule the people >developing the site. You guys do this to divert attention from the >misinformation being presented about this issue. > >The RIPE reports on this issue are worthless and the reasons are >explained at: > >http://whoissecurity.com/europeans-restrict-ip-address-whois-data/ >http://whoissecurity.com/historical-whois-data-and-privacy-laws/ > >As for the whois scraping and the packaging and resale of whois data see > >http://whoissecurity.com/historical-whois-data-look-who-sells-it/ > >So as you can see the issues are already researched to a certain extent >but I am sure things have been missed. > >Please use the form submission at the site since I do not monitor this >list all the time.