[anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Tue Jul 31 19:57:29 CEST 2012
Hi Frank, Frank Gadegast <ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de> wrote: [...] > An option could be the following: > the possibility to set the abuse-mailbox field to something like > "non-responsive", a predefined value, thats valid according > to the format of the field. The cleanup will happen, the resource owner > makes a decision and the reporter could see, that the > resource owner does not want to have reports (via email) ... That seems pretty reasonable to me. Regards, Leo Vegoda -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5488 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120731/7cde5fe3/attachment.p7s>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]