[anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Arnold
wiegert at telus.net
Tue Jul 31 19:11:33 CEST 2012
On 31/07/2012 6:54 AM, Leo Vegoda wrote: > Hi Tobias, > > On Jul 31, 2012, at 6:33 am, Tobias Knecht <tk at abusix.com> wrote: > > […] > >> No. We had that conversations already and decided not to accept web >> addresses only. The reason is, that automatic reporting can not be done >> with web addresses. > Assuming you mean something accessible over HTTP or HTTPS, it does not have to be accessed by a person using a browser. If there was a widely adopted API, I can see the value in a URL for some kind of RESTful service for automatic reports that do not require human involvement. if it can be automated, it surely will be abused just as e-mail addresses. Why open another 'door' for SPAMMERs and then wonder why we will have to expend more effort to 'filter' what cames through. Arnold -- Fight Spam - report it with wxSR http://www.columbinehoney.net/wxSR.shtml
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]