[anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Frank Gadegast
ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de
Sun Jul 29 10:10:24 CEST 2012
lists at help.org wrote: > >Please supply a method instead of critizising the mandatory field ... > > Nothing wrong with a mandatory Ah, there we are, more substance. > field but you need to clean up the entire > database first. Why ? The abuse-c will automatically lead to a cleanup. The members will have to alter their objects, when the abuse-c is mandatory, and surely a lot of them will clean them up. The members could receive some guidelines from the NCC, when its there, like: "remove abuse information from the remarks, remove iRT objects only used for an abuse address aso ... And how: how will you clean up the database ? btw: this is a job for the db-wg ... > individual fields and it all should be coordinated with all the RIR's. Its a good idea and it should be IANAs work, but until then ? > For instance I recently saw a record in ARIN that says: > > Address: Private > City: Private > StateProv: NJ > PostalCode: 99999 > > The response from ARIN was: "If you believe the information below is false, can you provide more detail regarding the information you believe is inaccurate and > ARIN will research and take the appropriate action." I pointed out the whole record was false and I never heard back and it was never fixed. I don't see the point > of making anything mandatory if this is how things are done. Once these things get fixed I would agree with the mandatory field. Why in that order ? Please make this more clear. Kind regards, Frank -- PHADE Software - PowerWeb http://www.powerweb.de Inh. Dipl.-Inform. Frank Gadegast mailto:frank at powerweb.de Schinkelstrasse 17 fon: +49 33200 52920 14558 Nuthetal OT Rehbruecke, Germany fax: +49 33200 52921 ======================================================================
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]