[anti-abuse-wg] latest RIPE reply on privacy
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] latest RIPE reply on privacy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] latest RIPE reply on privacy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aftab Siddiqui
aftab.siddiqui at gmail.com
Fri Jan 27 14:13:53 CET 2012
> >If you think that the system is flawed (sorry, I don't agree with the > delusion that the ppl are fraud) > >than why not propose a policy to correct the system. Its just a matter of > couple of weeks > >work IFF you are correct. > > That is because the system is so flawed in its current state that it is a > waste of time. I already pointed to the > report to the community is so sketchy that the majority of the community > do not know what is actually going on > and RIPE is actively hiding information (such as the legal opinion) from > the community. So I don't agree with the > delusion that you have a working, legitimate system. What you have is a > small number of people who run > things their way and run anyone else "out of town." > > > If system is there no matter how flawed or bad it is, than it can be changed by all means and the procedure is already given. That is all what I can suggest to sum-up. Regards, Aftab A. Siddiqui. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120127/4419bcb9/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] latest RIPE reply on privacy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] latest RIPE reply on privacy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]