[anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
U.Mutlu security at mutluit.com
Wed Jan 18 18:30:34 CET 2012
Dan Luedtke wrote, On 2012-01-18 17:19: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:27 PM, U.Mutlu<security at mutluit.com> wrote: >> I even would like to have several (2 or 3) abuse contact email addresses >> as there are several kinds of abuses (spam with ads, spam with criminal >> intent, >> hacking attempts, flood attacks/(D)DoS, portscans, service attacks, >> copyright infringement, impersonation, sockpuppetry, insult/discrimination, >> ...), > > I like this kind of information to be embedded in the protocol/format > used for reporting. There are already standards being worked on, or > even used. This should not be part of the RIPE database itself. I guess you mean ARF/MARF (RFC 5965; http://www.ietf.org/dyn/wg/charter/marf-charter); yes, makes sense to handle the details therein. Of course ARF/MARF as well depends on a abuse contact, so we need a mandatory standard to follow, and therefore the current proposal of the wg should be ratified as soon as possible.