[anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 12, Issue 16

+1 to what Wout said.  Based on the M3AAWG endorsement of this
proposal, it has support from the largest ISPs and messaging providers
from around the world.

+1 to the proposal from me personally.

--srs

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Wout de Natris
<denatrisconsult at hotmail.nl> wrote:
> Brian,
>
> From my side a full support for the proposal. Without any obligations the
> proposal may never work as foreseen.
>
> And I would like to stress that Jerry Upton wrote on behalf of M3AAWG and in
> function as director, so representing the M3AAWG members. Looking at who
> those members are, I venture to see this as a very large support on behalf
> of the proposal.
>
> Best,
>
> Wout
>
>> From: anti-abuse-wg-request at ripe.net
>> Subject: anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 12, Issue 16
>> To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
>> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:00:02 +0200
>>
>> Send anti-abuse-wg mailing list submissions to
>> anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/anti-abuse-wg
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> anti-abuse-wg-request at ripe.net
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> anti-abuse-wg-owner at ripe.net
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of anti-abuse-wg digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. 2011-06 Move to Last Call (Abuse Contact Management in the
>> RIPE NCC Database) (Brian Nisbet)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 08:55:07 +0100
>> From: Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet at heanet.ie>
>> Subject: [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 Move to Last Call (Abuse Contact
>> Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
>> To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
>> Message-ID: <5031ED5B.6090905 at heanet.ie>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>
>> Colleagues,
>>
>> RIPE Proposal 2011-06 (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC
>> Database) has reached the end of its extended Review Phase and a
>> decision must now be made regarding the next steps. I (Tobias, as the
>> main proposer, has, as agreed & discussed stepped back from his co-chair
>> duties on this one) have gone through the various mails and discussions
>> from the the review phase, a short summary of which is below.
>>
>> I feel that the main thrust of the discussion on 2011-06 gave support to
>> the proposal.
>>
>> The initial discussion phase lead to a redrafting of the proposal and
>> some questions over the mandatory nature of the attribute and the future
>> of the IRTs. It was also clarified that while there may be further
>> output from the ACM-TF and/or further proposals in this space, 2011-06
>> was considered to be standalone.
>>
>> The second version was published on 16th April 2012, addressing, I
>> believe, a number of points raised during the initial discussion phase.
>> Some objections remained, such as opinions on the mandatory nature of
>> the object and the lack of a wider plan.
>>
>> In May 2012 it was decided to go ahead and move the proposal to Review
>> Phase, during which the RIPE NCC presented their impact analysis. This
>> gave rise to discussion regarding the future of the IRT object. I
>> believe that it has been clarified that while the NCC will put plans in
>> place to deal with the decommissioning of the IRT object, they will, of
>> course, only do so if the community proposes this. They have
>> acknowledged that 2011-06 does not contain this proposal and so no
>> action regarding the IRT object will be taken on foot of this proposal.
>> I believe that the wider IRT community are happy with this.
>>
>> There was relatively little discussion during Review Phase, so it was
>> extended for a further four weeks. During this time a number of
>> objections were restated (mandatory nature and data protection issues)
>> and discussed and a few new expressions of support were made.
>>
>> Overall it appears that there are three sustained objections to the
>> proposal and twelve clear expressions of support. The opinion of some
>> members of the list (who have commented) is unclear, however I feel
>> there is sufficient consensus to move this proposal to Last Call.
>>
>> Emilio will made the formal announcement from the RIPE NCC PDO.
>>
>> If you disagree with this interpretation, please let me know.
>>
>> Brian
>> Co-Chair, Anti-Abuse WG
>>
>>
>>
>> End of anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 12, Issue 16
>> *********************************************



-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)