[anti-abuse-wg] Maxis Communications Bhd

look, i and others are trying to get ripe ncc to actually fix a rather lackadaisical attitude to ip allocation and whois accuracy

what you are doing here seems to be using the list as an abuse desk substitute for reaching an isp with ip space in malaysia, which last i checked was still getting ip space from apnic, not ripe

--srs (iPad)

On 12-Apr-2012, at 17:21, "Reza Farzan" <rezaf at mindspring.com> wrote:

> 
> Hello Laura,
> 
> Reading most of the comments posted here, I see that most, if not all, want
> a clear accountability from the networks that provide our link to the
> Internet. Certainly, the RIPE NCC Report Form is a good start.
> 
> But as so many have stated the lack of accountability and sheer indifference
> on behalf of some networks in handling Abuse / Spam reports. A case in point
> that I like to bring to everyone's attention is Maxis Communications Bhd, in
> Malaysia.
> 
> Since 2009, I have traced and reported Abuse violations to Maxis
> Communications Bhd abuse team [ABUSE at maxis.com.my], but I just discovered
> that this network had ignored all my previous violations reports, as I just
> received the following "Not read" and "deleted without being read"
> confirmation notices in my inbox:
> 
> 
>  To:      Mail Abuse For Maxis Communications Bhd;
>  Cc:      Federal Trade Commission; junk at brightmail.com;
> nonregistered at coldrain.net; spam at mailpolice.com; spam at sendusspam.com;
> submitspam at fortinet.com; abuse at craigslist.org; postmaster at craigslist.org
>  Subject: REPORTING SPAM
>  Sent:    Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:23:44 +0800
> 
> was deleted without being read on Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:03:21 +0800
> 
> ++++
> 
>  To:      Mail Abuse For Maxis Communications Bhd; 
>  Cc:      Malaysian RMP; Federal Trade Commission; junk at brightmail.com;
> nonregistered at coldrain.net; report at dcm.mailprove.com;
> spam at mailpolice.com; spam at sendusspam.com; submitspam at fortinet.com
>  Subject: Spam: REPORTING SCAM/FRAUD
>  Sent:    Tue, 1 Sep 2009 06:47:31 +0800
> 
> was deleted without being read on Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:12:52 +0800
> 
> ++++
> 
>  To:      Mail Abuse For Maxis Communications Bhd; 
>  Cc:      Federal Trade Commission; junk at brightmail.com;
> nonregistered at coldrain.net; report at dcm.mailprove.com;
> spam at mailpolice.com; spam at sendusspam.com; submitspam at fortinet.com
>  Subject: REPORTING SPAM
>  Sent:    Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:49:27 +0800
> 
> was deleted without being read on Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:15:08 +0800
> 
> ++++
> 
> 
>  To:      Mail Abuse For Maxis Communications Bhd
>  Cc:      Federal Trade Commission; junk at brightmail.com;
> nanas at killfile.org; nonregistered at coldrain.net;
> report at dcm.mailprove.com; spam at mailpolice.com; spam at sendusspam.com;
> submitspam at fortinet.com
>  Subject: REPORTING SPAM
>  Sent:    Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:46:12 +0800
> 
> was deleted without being read on Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:12:51 +0800
> 
> 
> ++++
> 
> 
>  To:      Mail Abuse For Maxis Communications Bhd; 
>  Cc:      Federal Trade Commission; junk at brightmail.com;
> nanas at killfile.org; nonregistered at coldrain.net;
> report at dcm.mailprove.com; spam at mailpolice.com; spam at sendusspam.com;
> submitspam at fortinet.com
>  Subject: Spam: REPORTING SCAM/SPAM
>  Sent:    Thu, 7 May 2009 08:23:39 +0800
> 
> was deleted without being read on Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:12:51 +0800
> 
> 
> ++++
> 
> As these confirmations show, a network like Maxis Communications Bhd can
> simply choose not to respond, and completely ignore network violations
> reports, and after a few years [yes, YEARS] delete such reports as if
> nothing had happened.
> 
> To be fair, I have copied this network's technical contact Muhadzir Abdul
> Majid [zay at maxis.com.my] as well as their Whois only contact, Chiau Tik Tan
> [cttan at maxis.net.my] so that they can for themselves what actually happens
> when someone reports and sends an abuse report to Maxis Communications Bhd.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Reza Farzan 
> rezaf at mindspring.com
> 
>