[anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 8, Issue 9
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 8, Issue 9
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 8, Issue 9
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Apr 11 18:07:52 CEST 2012
icann does use this measure against registrars, not too infrequently --srs (iPad) On 11-Apr-2012, at 21:34, Frank Gadegast <ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de> wrote: > If RIPE NCC finally will force the LIRs to have correct abuse > contacts, it means that the LIR has to take care (well he inserted > the objects himself or delegated access to them to his customer), > its not interesting, if the customer provides correct details at all. > The LIR has to provide them, there are only objects inherited from > the LIR. > > And if he doesnt, well, punish the LIR ...
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 8, Issue 9
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 8, Issue 9
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]