[anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Frank Gadegast
ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de
Tue Nov 29 10:05:12 CET 2011
Adrian wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:19:31AM +0100, Frank Gadegast wrote: > > Hi, Hi, >> A "migration plan" cannot be located in a proposal, because it heavily >> depends on the work of the RIPE NCC and a plan include dates (to my >> understanding) wich shouldnt end up in a proposal. > > Lets say order the relevant technical processes should be included in this proposal (Some might call this a plan). Agreed. >>>> Another point: if the general idea of the policy is acceptable, wouldn't >>>> it be nice to have 2 abuse mailboxes: one for humans, one for bots? >>> >>> +1; >> >> Having two contacts might complicates things, it might be complicated >> for the end user to decide wich one to contact. >> >> Maybe it would be easier to make one contact wich has to be marked >> as "person", "role" or "robot". >> Both, end user or automatic reporting tools, could then decide themself, >> if the type of the contact fits their intention. >> It might also be nice to have a "preferred reporting method" field >> included, what could be "email, phone, url, ARF, X-ARF" or similar. > > What if the people or robots reporting to such an address, don't care about robot vs. human mailboxes and/or relevant reporting formats (or are reporting bogus due to bugs)? I would suggest, that every team/member/robot behind such an address should figure that for themselves. Also agreed, I recommend a "preferred" reporting method field, what should improve the reporting accuracy (we often receive emails back, wich simply includes a link to an online form, this could be shorted, when the URL is already included in the field). Surely its not 100%. Kind regards, Frank > > Cheers, Adrian > > > > -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen, -- PHADE Software - PowerWeb http://www.powerweb.de Inh. Dipl.-Inform. Frank Gadegast mailto:frank at powerweb.de Schinkelstrasse 17 fon: +49 33200 52920 14558 Nuthetal OT Rehbruecke, Germany fax: +49 33200 52921 ====================================================================== Public PGP Key available for frank at powerweb.de
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]