[anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database)

Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann.org> writes:
>
> However, I would suggest that if you want
> a data maintenance process to apply to the abuse-c object, then you
> should describe it. As you seem to want the RIPE NCC to remove the
> registration of address space if abuse-c's are not maintained
> appropriately, the standards required should be explicit and either
> included in the policy text or referenced by it.
>

I think this is a valid argument.
The proposal should contain the desired outcome as clear and explicitly
as possible. And I don't think the desired outcome is to just have a
role or person object referenced as the abuse contact, but to actually
have abuse contacts.


-- 
Kostas Zorbadelos		
twitter:@kzorbadelos		http://gr.linkedin.com/in/kzorba 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
()  www.asciiribbon.org - against HTML e-mail & proprietary attachments
/\