[anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database) - addtional needs
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database) - addtional needs
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Adrian
ripe-wg-antiabuse at kyubu.de
Thu Nov 24 14:17:06 CET 2011
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:46:38AM +0100, Frank Gadegast wrote: hi, > At least an abuse-c is much nicer to parse for the normal people than > an IRT object, because it will appear in the normal whois output for > any IP asked for. This is also true for the IRT object. Parsing is as easy as parsing any other object. > - how or who will test, if an abuce-c is correct ? > - will the whois state, who to contact (or wich URL to visit), > if an abuse-c isnt reachable or correct ? > - what is happening, if the abuce-c isnt correct ? Thanks for bringing up these questions. Trusted Introducer solved all of these some time ago. Cheers, Adrian
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database) - addtional needs
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2011-06 New Policy Proposal (Abuse Contact
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]