[anti-abuse-wg] Policy proposal: closing allocation/assignment window, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy proposal: closing allocation/assignment window, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: Policy proposal: closing allocation/assignment window, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Mon Mar 14 02:24:22 CET 2011
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet <Woeber at cc.univie.ac.at> wrote: > To be more precise: to submit the request on behalf of the applicant. > Presumably the sponsoring LIR has already made sure that the requirements > are met, before forwarding to the NCC. Depends on whether or not the LIR is complicit in the matter or not. > the NCC issue an invoice and follow up. Local payment is simpler and > cheaper than international money transfer for some regions... Still? > Plus, there is a contractual requirement for the sponsoring LIR to keep > the records for the PI stuff up to date and/or make sure that the holder > of the resource complies. Well, I'm on the other hand assured that "we're not the document police" - which was a quote from someone else one or two abuse-wg meetings back .. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy proposal: closing allocation/assignment window, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: Policy proposal: closing allocation/assignment window, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]