[anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Jul 28 10:46:11 CEST 2011
Let us put it this way - RIPE should check those lists for hijacked netblocks. And evidence of other fraudulent behavior exhibited during the RIPE registration process (eg : the numerous fake LIRs, assigned PI / PA netblocks allocated to botmasters with fake whois etc) On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight <michele at blacknight.ie> wrote: > > On 28 Jul 2011, at 09:12, Frank Gadegast wrote: > >> >> Looks like to me, that RIPE NCC should defny compare RIPEs netblocks >> to several blacklists. This will indicate highjacked or misused >> netblocks quite easily. > > > That's out of scope for RIPE > > Just because a netblock is blacklisted by a list doesn't actually mean much and as a RIPE member I would be very annoyed if they started getting into this kind of thing -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]