[anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] blacklisted by the RIPE NCC --was Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Feb 3 02:31:35 CET 2011
That's not what we are driving at, at all. I would be interested in seeing the status of the Rasmussen and Knecht proposals once they go forward. On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann.org> wrote: > > If some people want particular individuals or companies to be blacklisted by the RIPE NCC then they need to make a formal proposal along those lines. I have not seen a proposal for a RIPE NCC operated blacklist of known blaggards who must not be allowed access to IP addresses but would be interested in reviewing a proposal if it is forthcoming. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] blacklisted by the RIPE NCC --was Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]