[anti-abuse-wg] blacklisted by the RIPE NCC --was Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] blacklisted by the RIPE NCC --was Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alessandro Vesely
vesely at tana.it
Wed Feb 2 19:07:53 CET 2011
On 02/Feb/11 18:31, Leo Vegoda wrote: > If some people want particular individuals or companies to be > blacklisted by the RIPE NCC then they need to make a formal > proposal along those lines. I have not seen a proposal for a RIPE > NCC operated blacklist of known blaggards who must not be allowed > access to IP addresses but would be interested in reviewing a > proposal if it is forthcoming. Yes, I would want that individuals or companies who cannot comply with a minimal policy be blacklisted. The minimal policy would be to provide the email address of an abuse team who at least tries to investigate on abuse issues related to their IPs. This may sound similar to proposals withdrawn at RIPE 61... What does it mean "A task force will be organised to solve the implementation issues pointed out by the proposal discussion"? Is it something that is going to land on this mailing list, sometimes?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] blacklisted by the RIPE NCC --was Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]