[anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Mon Dec 12 19:11:45 CET 2011
and s/gmail/any other provider/ and my statement below would still apply. I'm not picking on gmail or yahoo here. On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > No no... let's not confine conversation to one mailbox, or one small > personal domain. Please. > > If you run a large enough mail system, you'll see quite a lot of spam > issues on gmail as well (google groups and other google properties > too, just as you'd see distinct yahoo properties such as yahoogroups > have their own abuse volumes, challenges etc) > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:24 PM, peter h <peter at hk.ipsec.se> wrote: >> >> It's years ago since i had any mail conversation with a yahoo-customer. But i still get >> spam from various yahoo-ranges, none of them related to former contacts. It's simply >> a lazy policy that allows abuse of their resources. > > > > -- > Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com) -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]