[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Aug 18 03:32:32 CEST 2011
I'd actually support a form (and maybe also a word / rtf doc with questions, for those who reach out over email) with a detailed questionnaire that helps you ask the most important questions you need to determine whether an audit should be carried out. --srs On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet <Woeber at cc.univie.ac.at> wrote: > > I am not proposing to abandon or to replace "abuse at ripe.net", because it > probably does serve a valid purpose, within the fremawork of the assumed > semantics (as Peter has pointed out already!), > but rather to create a sort of formal complaints process against an LIR. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Abuse Complaints, Audits and Reports
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]