[anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Wed Aug 10 12:45:56 CEST 2011
Vissers, Pepijn wrote: [...] > This is exactly the mechanism on which we (OPTA) recently developed an > enforcement strategy; educate hosting ISP's in NL from which we see abuse > that is within our enforcement range: spam and malware. If the normal abuse > mechanisms do not work the way they should we start to use our LEA > capabilities to apply pressure. This has proven to be very effective: lots > of cases solved with small efforts. In most cases this pressure moved the > ISPs started to gather reports on their own networks and act by themselves. > > Of course, we can only do this within our jurisdiction, but it would be nice > if other spam/malware legislative bodies start doing this too, or any body > that can apply some real pressure. I think the FICORA approach and environment would be another good example. > Pepijn Such activities are probably considerably more successful than trying to turn the RIPE NCC into a "Super-NOC" or Incident Coordination HotSpot. Wilfried.