[anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Aug 10 12:45:44 CEST 2011
A common fallacy Think on the lines of "there are lots of people who vote for a politician you consider a jackass, but he hardly ever wins an election anyway" Then think how many complaints about a valid user you get when just one or two stray emails of his get misreported, compared to when that user gets his password compromised by a nigerian or has his PC infected by a virus. Clear enough now? It becomes crystal clear when you have a userbase of, say, a couple of million like I do now, or 40 million ++ like I had till about 2009. Becomes even clearer when you offer feedback loops yourself based on spam reported by your users. --srs On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Niall Donegan <niall at blacknight.com> wrote: > > After seeing our AOL Scomp feed and the obviously legit email that often > gets reported as spam by their users, I'm not sure if I'd like it to be > made too easy for the mass unwashed to report "spam" or "abuse". -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]