[anti-abuse-wg] Nial & Thor...
firstname.lastname@example.org world.antispam.report at inbox.com
Tue Aug 9 19:30:15 CEST 2011
Yes, I sure did used the whole email address and repeated once the first time I seen the post. Then, when I saw Nial post getting the server "Live" reply, I repeated that email abuse.tiws at telefonica.com testing. Same reply: "550 5.1.1 Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table". However, I used a webased engine for the testing since I didn't had time to install all my tools on this little puter I use. I mean, and I know for a fact that many networks that offer that type of tool (Testing email addresses) can be blocked, blacklisted AKA refused connection with given networks. And misery! For now, it's the only website that I have a bookmark on my present puter. "I" wouldn't file a complaint to any RIPE official 'cause I went to see the main webage of that network and it is rather easy to see that it is an Europeen network that initiated a USA based outlet. In short, we ain't talking 'bout rogue abusers!... Maybe the tech. over there had things to do and got a little late? I feel that if there was no mention of virus or trojan source in the first post talking about that topic, I wouldn't like to be in the same situation and be brought down. That is one of the reason I rather remain confidential. Relax & enjoy! ========================================= > -----Original Message----- > From: thor.kottelin at turvasana.com > Sent: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 19:59:32 +0300 > To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net > Subject: RE: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: anti-abuse-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:anti-abuse-wg- >> admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of abuse at localhost.com >> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 7:02 PM >> To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net > >> Reply from "abuse.tiws at telefonica.com";=> >> 10 smtpus.telefonica.com [188.8.131.52]. >> 550 5.1.1 <abuse.tiws>: >> Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table. > > rcpt to:<abuse.tiws at telefonica.com> > 250 2.1.5 Ok > > Did you, by any chance, omit the domain name (as "<abuse.tiws>" would > seem > to indicate), or did you actually send mail and receive a bounce > afterwards? > > If the address is incorrect, you could report the matter to the RIPE NCC, > as > Ms Fragkouli explained a few days ago. > > The remaining addresses also seem to work: > >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: thor.kottelin at turvasana.com >>> Sent: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 18:17:33 +0300 >>> To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net > >>> OOM-RIPE > > 250 2.1.5 Ok > >>> RSB20-RIPE > > 250 2.1.5 Ok > >>> NSA20-RIPE > > 250 2.1.5 Ok > >>> HNM15-RIPE > > 250 2.1.5 Ok > >>> COO5-RIPE > > 250 2.1.5 Ok > > -- > Thor Kottelin > http://www.anta.net/ ____________________________________________________________ TRY FREE IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if5 Capture screenshots, upload images, edit and send them to your friends through IMs, post on Twitter®, Facebook®, MySpace™, LinkedIn® – FAST!