[anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database

The emailadress I contacted was the one where they mention the AS-number
remarks:   Any Notification about AS12956 security please e-mail to :
remarks:   security.tiws at telefonica.com



I got a bounce from it:

Generating server: latam.telefonica.corp

security.tiws at telefonica.com
#550 5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipNotFound; not found
##rfc822;security.tiws at telefonica.com

Original message headers:

Received: from ARTASMSP072.latam.telefonica.corp (10.213.2.21) by
 ARTASMSP063.latam.telefonica.corp (10.213.1.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server
 (TLS) id 8.3.83.0; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 09:12:06 -0300
Received: from artasgw002.latam.telefonica.corp (192.168.200.7) by
 ARTASMSP072.latam.telefonica.corp (10.213.2.21) with Microsoft SMTP
Server id
 8.3.83.0; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 09:16:14 -0300
Received: from artasgw002.latam.telefonica.corp (unknown [127.0.0.1])	by
IMSA
 (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35D02C8065	for <security.tiws at telefonica.com>;
Mon,
  8 Aug 2011 11:56:46 -0300 (ART)
Received: from smtpauth.pi-group.net (unknown [94.126.48.65])	by
 artasgw002.latam.telefonica.corp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5341C2C8059	for
 <security.tiws at telefonica.com>; Mon,  8 Aug 2011 11:56:45 -0300 (ART)
Received: from [192.168.0.129] (d54C0DB02.access.telenet.be [84.192.219.2])
	(Authenticated sender: admingent)	by smtpauth.pi-group.net (Postfix) with
 ESMTPA id B96A01D4175;	Mon,  8 Aug 2011 14:11:54 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E3FD2A2.4050605 at webservice.be>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:12:18 +0200
From: Webservice <info at webservice.be>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18)
Gecko/20110617 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <security.tiws at telefonica.com>
CC: Cloudforce <cloudforce at ris.be>
Subject: BGP conflict




Op 09-08-11 18:59, Thor Kottelin schreef:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: anti-abuse-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:anti-abuse-wg-
>> admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of abuse at localhost.com
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 7:02 PM
>> To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
> 
>> Reply from "abuse.tiws at telefonica.com";=>
>> 10 smtpus.telefonica.com [216.177.207.223].
>> 550 5.1.1 <abuse.tiws>:
>> Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table.
> 
> rcpt to:<abuse.tiws at telefonica.com>
> 250 2.1.5 Ok
> 
> Did you, by any chance, omit the domain name (as "<abuse.tiws>" would seem 
> to indicate), or did you actually send mail and receive a bounce afterwards?
> 
> If the address is incorrect, you could report the matter to the RIPE NCC, as 
> Ms Fragkouli explained a few days ago.
> 
> The remaining addresses also seem to work:
> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: thor.kottelin at turvasana.com
>>> Sent: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 18:17:33 +0300
>>> To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
> 
>>> OOM-RIPE
> 
> 250 2.1.5 Ok
> 
>>> RSB20-RIPE
> 
> 250 2.1.5 Ok
> 
>>> NSA20-RIPE
> 
> 250 2.1.5 Ok
> 
>>> HNM15-RIPE
> 
> 250 2.1.5 Ok
> 
>>> COO5-RIPE
> 
> 250 2.1.5 Ok
> 

-- 
--
www.webservice.be
Amelsdorp 72, 3740 Bilzen, Belgium
Tel: +32.89257404, Fax: +32.70423475