[anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Here's a few factual examples Wilfried:=>
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Karl-Josef Ziegler
kjz at gmx.net
Mon Aug 8 20:27:39 CEST 2011
> They define "hijacked netblocks" in > http://www.spamhaus.org/faq/answers.lasso?section=DROP%20FAQ#258 And, if you look it up there: http://www.spamhaus.org/rokso/evidence.lasso?rokso_id=ROK2493 you can get: APNIC: 18 listings http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/listings.lasso?isp=apnic ARIN: 258 listings http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/listings.lasso?isp=arin LACNIC: 26 listings http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/listings.lasso?isp=lacnic RIPE: has far too many records to list. This ISP has an extremely serious spam problem. http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/listings.lasso?isp=arin Hmmm... 'extremely serious spam problem'? Only RIPE 'has far too many records to list.' What's this? Best regards, - Karl-Josef
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Here's a few factual examples Wilfried:=>
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]