[anti-abuse-wg] Time Stamps (?)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Time Stamps (?)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Time Stamps (?)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Tue Sep 28 03:05:42 CEST 2010
In message <6D779DA7-C665-409B-903C-FC0A7DB47BBF at icann.org>, you wrote: >On 27 Sep 2010, at 4:57, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > >[...] > >> So anyway, has it ever been considered to add date/time stamps to RIPE >> whois records, at least for record _creation_ if not also for last >> modification time? > >Andrei Robachevsky proposed something along those lines a while back: > >http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-40/presentations/timestamping/index.= >html > >I remember that there were some objections but as this was almost a decade = >ago it is possible that people have changed their minds. All I can say is that we here in ARIN space seem to have been surviving having time stamps on our whois records, without too many ill effects, for quite a long time now. (And the world hasn't come to an end, as far as I know.) Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Time Stamps (?)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Time Stamps (?)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]