[anti-abuse-wg] Support and comments - prop 2010-08
Alessandro Vesely vesely at tana.it
Thu Nov 18 16:48:19 CET 2010
On 17/Nov/10 14:11, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > First - I support the addition of a mandatory abuse-mailbox: field in > the IRT object. +1 > 1. There is no requirement that the contact information be accurate > (that the mailbox exists and is monitored, action taken on reports) > > 2. There is no mention of what action should / will be taken in case > this contact information turns out to be wrong (or deliberately faked) I hope theses issues will be addressed next.