[anti-abuse-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-10 New Policy Proposal (Adding reference to sponsoring LIR in inetnum, inet6num and aut-num objects)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-10 New Policy Proposal (Adding reference to sponsoring LIR in inetnum, inet6num and aut-num objects)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-10 New Policy Proposal (Adding reference to sponsoring LIR in inetnum, inet6num and aut-num objects)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Fri Nov 12 14:31:35 CET 2010
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:57:16PM +0000, James Blessing wrote: > On 12 November 2010 12:47, Emilio Madaio <emadaio at ripe.net> wrote: > > You can find the full proposal at: > > > > http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-10.html > > > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > > <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> before 10 December 2010. > > Initial thoughts... > > So what happens to 'orphaned' resources? Are RIPE NCC the 'sponsoring' > LIR in this circumstance? If you think in terms of business logic, then answer is: the same as right now. If you think in terms of db logic, then answer is: special object. > Does the NCC have the resources to deal with the increased level of > avuse complaints that may be targeted at them with this change? In my opinion, there will be no problem. Orphaned resource is temporary situation. > Who would be responsible for maintaining the relationship, the > sponsoring LIR or the End user? Does this have an implication for mnt > objects? LIR. But to be honest - proposed new prototypes would make this easier, and move this responsibility to automatic robot. Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-10 New Policy Proposal (Adding reference to sponsoring LIR in inetnum, inet6num and aut-num objects)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-10 New Policy Proposal (Adding reference to sponsoring LIR in inetnum, inet6num and aut-num objects)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]